DIGITAL PARTICIPATION OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN REGIONAL PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: EXPERIENCE OF SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Keywords:
цифровое участие, цифровой активизм, цифровые коммуникации, органы государственной власти, молодёжь, развитие региона, цифровая платформа, социальные сетиAbstract
The article examines the transformation of the public communication system in the Russian Federation under the influence of digitalization, which is reshaping the interaction between government institutions and society. The traditional model of one-way information transmission is being replaced by a more balanced and dialogical format based on transparency, openness, and the involvement of citizens in decision-making processes. Special attention is given to the phenomenon of digital civic participation among young people, who represent the most technologically adaptive and socially active group. Using the Sverdlovsk region as an empirical case, the study analyzes the conditions and practices of youth engagement in digital communication with public authorities. Despite the high proportion of youth in the region, their level of involvement in digital channels of interaction and public governance remains relatively low. This is explained by insufficient awareness of available participation tools, low trust in the responsiveness of public institutions, and symbolic rather than substantive forms of online presence of authorities. The study concludes that for the development of sustainable practices of digital participation, the “digital dialogue” format must shift toward partnership, transparency, and supported civic engagement. Increasing media literacy, improving communication strategies of public bodies, and strengthening feedback mechanisms are considered essential steps for enhancing youth civic agency in the digital environment.Downloads
References
СПИСОК ИСТОЧНИКОВ
1. Dunleavy, P. et all. (2006). Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government (Oxford, 2006; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct.) DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001, accessed 3 May 2025.
2. Provan, K.G., Lemaire, R.H. (2012). Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice. Public Administration Review. 72(5.), 638-648. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02595.x.
3. Schaefer, M. (2015). Digital Public Sphere. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (ed. Mazzoleni G), London: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087.
4. Drechsler, W. (2004). Governance, Good Governance and Government: The Case for Estonian Administrative Capacity. Trames Journals of humanities and social sciences. 4, 388-396. DOI: 10.3176/tr.2004.4.04.
5. Tim O'Reilly. Government as a Platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 2011; 6 (1): 13-40. DOI: 10.1162/INOV_a_00056.
6. Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvcb59n3. DOI: 10.2307/4134407.
7. Ludlow, P. (2002). Crypto Anarchy, Cyberstates and Pirate Utopias. Info. 4(6), 61-61. DOI: 10.1108/info.2002.4.6.61.1
8. Trencher, G. (2019). Towards the SM art city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using SM artness as a tool for tackling social challenges. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 142, 117-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033.
9. Перезолова А.С. Практики партисипативного управления в публичной политике. Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Политология. 2018. № 20(1). С. 122-130. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2018-20-1-122-130 EDN: YTFDXC.
10. Fung, A. The Participedia Project: An Introduction (2011). International Journal of Public Management. Vol. 14. № 3. P. 341-362. DOI: 10.1080/10967494.2011.618309.
11. Allegretti, G., Bassoli, M., Colavolpi, G. (2021). On the Verge of Institutionalisation? Participatory Budgeting Evidence in Five Italian Regions. Financial Journal. 13 (2): 25-45. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2021-2-25-45 EDN: YFICQY.
12. Банных Г.А., Режецкая А.И. Цифровое участие граждан в принятии публичных решений в современной России // Цифровое общество: социологическое измерение настоящего и будущего: Сборник материалов конференции, Москва, 02-03 ноября 2023 года. Москва: Российское общество социологов, 2024. С. 148-156. EDN PMHGAK.
13. Лебезова Э.М., Овчаренко Л.А. Модель цифрового участия граждан в смартсреде // Journal of new economy. 2022. Т. 23. № 3. С. 6285. DOI 10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-3-4. DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-3-4 EDN: BLERCX.
14. Gu, D., Dupre, M.E. (ed.) (2021). Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9.
15. Венцель С.В. Политический экстремизм в эпоху новых медиа: специфика, формы и технологии противодействия: дисс. на соиск. уч. степ. канд. политол-х н. Ростов-на-Дону: ЮФУ, 2024. 124 с. EDN: IWILWF.
16. Загорский В.С., Липенцев А.В. Эволюция подходов к исследованию современных концепций государственного управления // Вестник государственного и муниципального управления. 2013. №. 2. С. 13-22. EDN: QZVTAX.
17. Wojcik, S., Mabi, C., Lupovici, R. (2023). Pouvoir local et dispositifs numériques: introduction. Les Enjeux de l’information et de la communication. №. 1. P. 5-12. DOI: 10.3917/enic.034.0005 EDN: JMDMXB.
18. Епинина В.С. Модели партисипативного механизма публичного управления Российской Федерации // Управление экономическими системами: электронный научный журнал. 2012. № 12(48). С. 36. EDN: PXCMFR.
19. Kim, Y. (2015). Digital Populism in South Korea? Internet Culture and the Trouble with Direct Participation. In: Shah, Nishant;Sneha, Puthiya Purayil;Chattapadhyay, Sumandro: Digital Activism in Asia Reader. Lüneburg: meson press, p. 113-126. DOI:10.25969/mediarep/1317.
20. Карлина А.А., Рязанов Д.И. Партисипативные принципы публичного управления социально-экономическим развитием города // Вестник Самарского муниципального института управления. 2016. №. 4. С. 44-51. EDN: ZXFQMN.
21. Режецкая А.И. Роль социальных медиа и информационных технологий в реализации народной правотворческой инициативы // Парламентаризм: региональный аспект формирования законодательства: сборник научных трудов всероссийской научно-практической студенческой конференции, Курган, 29 марта 2024 года. Курган: Курганский государственный университет, 2025. С. 129-137. EDN ZFBOJL.
22. Mabillard, V., Zumofen, R., Pasquier, M. (2024). Social Media Use in Central and Eastern European Cities: Defining Local Government-Citizen Relationships through Phases. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 16(1):232-253. DOI: 10.2478/nispa-2023-0010 EDN: EXAZII.
23. Dominic, D., & Gisip, I.A. (2020). Effect of social media usage in government communication effort. In: Current issues, emerging design and system in management, technology and education. Kaizentrenovation Sdn Bhd Proton City, Malaysia DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/9277.
24. Dong, C., & Ji, Y. (2018). Connecting young adults to democracy via government social network sites. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 762-775. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.05.004.
25. Реутов Е.В., Реутова М.Н. Доверие к муниципальной власти и интеграция социального пространства местного сообщества // Среднерусский вестник общественных наук. 2016. Т. 11, № 5. С. 12-21. DOI 10.12737/22689. EDN XEARFZ.
26. Петухов Р.В. Особенности формирования доверия к муниципальной власти среди молодых россиян // Социологическая наука и социальная практика. 2023. Т. 11, № 4. С. 134-155. DOI 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.4.6. EDN GTYSBY.
27. Ширяева В.А., Ленская И.Ю. Доверие населения к органам муниципальной власти как основа активного участия граждан в общественной жизни муниципального образования: современное состояние // Вестник экономики, права и социологии. 2017. № 1. С. 183-186. DOI 10.18454/VEPS.2017.1.5524. EDN YKGQYJ.
28. Майкова Э.Ю., Симонова Е.В. Взаимосвязь доверия к местному самоуправлению и участия в самоуправленческих практиках (на примере Тверской области) // Социологические исследования. 2023. № 2. С. 28-40. DOI 10.31857/ S013216250023178-8. EDN QYHDCN.
29. Савчук Г.А., Банных Г.А., Кульпин С.В., Курашов Р.М. Коммуникация студенческой молодёжи с органами местного самоуправления в социальных медиа // Научный результат. Социология и управление. 2024. № 3. С. 168-183. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2024-10-3-1-1 EDN: OJFUNO.
30. Нотман О.В. Социальная технология формирования микролокальных режимов взаимодействия субъектов муниципальной власти и городских стейкхолдеров // Вопросы Управления. 2022. № 75(2), с. 61-75. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2022-2-61-75 EDN: UBNQWW.
1. Dunleavy, P. et all. (2006). Digital Era Governance: IT Corporations, the State, and e-Government (Oxford, 2006; online edn, Oxford Academic, 3 Oct.) DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199296194.001.0001, accessed 3 May 2025.
2. Provan, K.G., Lemaire, R.H. (2012). Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks: Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice. Public Administration Review. 72(5.), 638-648. DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02595.x.
3. Schaefer, M. (2015). Digital Public Sphere. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication (ed. Mazzoleni G), London: Wiley Blackwell. DOI: 10.1002/9781118541555.wbiepc087.
4. Drechsler, W. (2004). Governance, Good Governance and Government: The Case for Estonian Administrative Capacity. Trames Journals of humanities and social sciences. 4, 388-396. DOI: 10.3176/tr.2004.4.04.
5. Tim O'Reilly; Government as a Platform. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization 2011; 6(1): 13-40. DOI: 10.1162/INOV_a_00056.
6. Fountain, J.E. (2001). Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings Institution Press. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7864/j.ctvcb59n3. DOI:10.2307/4134407.
7. Ludlow, P. (2002). Crypto Anarchy, Cyberstates and Pirate Utopias. Info. 4(6), 61-61. DOI: 10.1108/info.2002.4.6.61.1.
8. Trencher, G. (2019). Towards the SM art city 2.0: Empirical evidence of using SM artness as a tool for tackling social challenges. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 142, 117-128. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.033.
9. Perezolova, A.S. (2018). Practice of participatory management in public policy. Bulletin of the Russian University of Friendship of Nations. Series: Political Science. 20(1). 122-130. DOI: 10.22363/2313-1438-2018-20-1-122-130 EDN: YTFDXC. (In Russ.)
10. Fung, A. The Participedia Project: An Introduction (2011). International Journal of Public Management. Vol. 14. № 3. P. 341-362. DOI:10.1080/10967494.2011.618309.
11. Allegretti, G., Bassoli, M., Colavolpi, G. (2021). On the Verge of Institutionalisation? Participatory Budgeting Evidence in Five Italian Regions. Financial Journal. 13 (2): 25-45. DOI: 10.31107/2075-1990-2021-2-25-45 EDN: YFICQY.
12. Bannykh, G.A., Rezhetskaya, A.I. (2023). Digital participation of citizens in public decision-making in modern Russia // Digital Society: the Sociological dimension of the present and the future: Conference Proceedings, Moscow, November 02-03. Moscow: Russian Society of Sociologists, pp. 148-156. EDN PMHGAK. (In Russ.)
13. Lebesova, E.M., Ovcharenko, L.A. (2022). Model of digital participation of citizens in the smartphone. Journal of new economy. Т. 23. № 3. 62-85. DOI 10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-3-4. DOI: 10.29141/2658-5081-2022-23-3-4 EDN: BLERCX. (In Russ.)
14. Gu, D., Dupre, M.E. (ed.) (2021). Encyclopedia of gerontology and population aging. Cham: Springer International Publishing. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-22009-9.
15. Wenzel, S.V. (2024). Political extremism in the era of new media: specificity, forms and technologies of counteraction: diss. for the academic degree. Candidate of Political Sciences.Rostov-on-Don: YuFU. 124. EDN: IWILWF. (In Russ.)
16. Zagorsky, V.S., Lipentsev, A.V. (2013). Evolution of approaches to the study of modern concepts of public administration. Bulletin of state and municipal administration. №. 2. Pp. 13-22. EDN: QZVTAX. (In Russ.)
17. Wojcik, S., Mabi, C., Lupovici, R. (2023). Pouvoir local et dispositifs numériques: introduction. Les Enjeux de l’information et de la communication. № 1. P. 5-12. DOI: 10.3917/enic.034.0005 EDN: JMDMXB.
18. Epinina, V.S. (2012). Models of the participatory mechanism of public administration of the Russian Federation. Management of economic systems: an electronic scientific journal. 12(48). 36. EDN: PXCMFR. (In Russ.)
19. Kim, Y. (2015). Digital Populism in South Korea? Internet Culture and the Trouble with Direct Participation. In: Shah, Nishant;Sneha, Puthiya Purayil;Chattapadhyay, Sumandro: Digital Activism in Asia Reader. Lüneburg: meson press, p. 113-126. DOI:10.25969/mediarep/1317.
20. Karlina, A.A., Ryazanov, D.I. (2016). Participatory principles of public management social and economic development of the city. Bulletin of the Samara Municipal Management Institute. № 4. P. 44-51. EDN: ZXFQMN. (In Russ.)
21. Rezetskaya, A.Y. (2025). Role of social media and information technologies in implementation of the popular law-making initiative // Parliamentarism: a regional aspect of the formation of legislation: collection of scientific papers of the All-Russian scientific and practical student conference, Kurgan, March 29, 2024. Kurgan: Kurgan State University, 129-137. EDN ZFBOJL. (In Russ.)
22. Mabillard, V., Zumofen, R., Pasquier, M. (2024). Social Media Use in Central and Eastern European Cities: Defining Local Government-Citizen Relationships through Phases. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 16(1):232-253. DOI:10.2478/nispa-2023-0010 EDN: EXAZII.
23. Dominic, D., & Gisip, I.A. (2020). Effect of social media usage in government communication effort. In: Current issues, emerging design and system in management, technology and education. Kaizentrenovation Sdn Bhd Proton City, Malaysia DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i3/9277.
24. Dong, C., & Ji, Y. (2018). Connecting young adults to democracy via government social network sites. Public Relations Review, 44(5), 762-775. DOI: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2018.05.004.
25. Reutov, E.V., Reutova, M.N. (2016). Trust in municipal authority and integration of social space of local community. The Medierussian Bulletin of Social Sciences. Т. 11, № 5. 12-21. DOI 10.12737/22689. EDN XEARFZ. (In Russ.)
26. Petukhov, R.V. (2023). Features of forming trust to municipal authority among young Russians. Sociological science and social practice. 2023. Т. 11, № 4. P. 134-155. DOI 10.19181/snsp.2023.11.4.6. EDN GTYSBY. (In Russ.)
27. Shirayaeva, V.A., Lenskaya, Y.Y. (2017). Public confidence in municipal authorities as the basis for active participation of citizens in the public life of municipal education: current status. Bulletin of economics, law and sociology. № 1. P. 183-186. DOI 10.18454/VEPS.2017.1.5524. EDN YKGQYJ. (In Russ.)
28. Mykova, E.Y., Simonova, E.V. (2023). Relationship of confidence to local self-government and participation in self-management practices (on the example of the Tver region). Sociological research. № 2. P. 28-40. DOI 10.31857/ S013216250023178-8. EDN QYHDCN. (In Russ.)
29. Savchuk, G.A., Bannykh, G.A., Kuplyn, S.V., Kurashov, R.M. (2024). Communication of student youth with local self-government bodies in social media. Scientific result. Sociology and management. № 3. P. 168-183. DOI: 10.18413/2408-9338-2024-10-3-1-1 EDN: OJFUNO. (In Russ.)
30. Notman, O.V. (2022). Social technology of formation of microlocal modes of interaction of subjects of municipal authority and city stakeholders. Management issues. № 75(2), p. 61-75. DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2022-2-61-75 EDN: UBNQWW. (In Russ.)
